3LDK · 193.69m² land · 78.66m² building · Built 1976
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable. The score is deliberately mid-range, so local hazard detail should carry more weight than the headline number.
Priced above similar nearby properties.
Some amenities are nearby, but a car is still helpful.
The area shows some demographic softness, but not a collapse signal.
Age and condition likely imply heavier renovation work.
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
Built under the pre-1981 seismic code. Japan's 1981 reform materially strengthened earthquake-resistance requirements, so retrofit planning is usually part of due diligence.Estimated retrofit cost: ~¥1.5–2.5M
Loading nearby earthquake history...
Loading nearest mapped fault...
Similar price range in the same area
埼玉県入間市高倉５
¥22,000,000
埼玉県蓮田市藤ノ木２
¥22,000,000
埼玉県川越市川鶴３
¥22,000,000
埼玉県久喜市本町２
¥21,990,000
埼玉県北葛飾郡松伏町大字松伏
¥21,990,000
埼玉県久喜市本町２
¥21,990,000