5DK · 2617.39m² land · 84.72m² building · Built 1977
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable. The score is deliberately mid-range, so local hazard detail should carry more weight than the headline number.
Well priced relative to similar nearby properties.
Some amenities are nearby, but a car is still helpful.
This market is in meaningful population decline, which can pressure services and resale demand.
Age and condition likely imply heavier renovation work.
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
Built under the pre-1981 seismic code. Japan's 1981 reform materially strengthened earthquake-resistance requirements, so retrofit planning is usually part of due diligence.Estimated retrofit cost: ~¥1.5–2.5M
Loading nearby earthquake history...
Loading nearest mapped fault...
Similar price range in the same area
千葉県千葉市若葉区大宮台４
¥15,800,000
千葉県佐倉市野狐台町
¥15,800,000
千葉県千葉市花見川区作新台５
¥15,800,000
千葉県印旛郡酒々井町東酒々井４
¥15,800,000
千葉県長生郡長生村一松丙
¥15,800,000
千葉県千葉市緑区越智町
¥15,800,000