3K · 47.66m² land · 52.65m² building · Built 1968
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable. The score is deliberately mid-range, so local hazard detail should carry more weight than the headline number.
Priced above similar nearby properties.
Some amenities are nearby, but a car is still helpful.
The area shows some demographic softness, but not a collapse signal.
Age and condition likely imply heavier renovation work.
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
Built under the pre-1981 seismic code. Japan's 1981 reform materially strengthened earthquake-resistance requirements, so retrofit planning is usually part of due diligence.Estimated retrofit cost: ~¥1.5–2.5M
Loading nearby earthquake history...
Loading nearest mapped fault...
Similar price range in the same area
大阪府茨木市山手台３
¥21,800,000
大阪府富田林市梅の里４
¥21,800,000
大阪府泉大津市北豊中町２
¥21,800,000
大阪府池田市畑１
¥21,800,000
大阪府大阪市阿倍野区丸山通２
¥21,800,000
大阪府泉南市新家
¥21,800,000