Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable. The score is deliberately mid-range, so local hazard detail should carry more weight than the headline number.
Well priced relative to similar nearby properties.
Restricted rebuild options, often due to road-access or zoning constraints.
Some amenities are nearby, but a car is still helpful.
The area shows some demographic softness, but not a collapse signal.
Age and condition likely imply heavier renovation work.
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
Built under the pre-1981 seismic code. Japan's 1981 reform materially strengthened earthquake-resistance requirements, so retrofit planning is usually part of due diligence.Estimated retrofit cost: ~¥1.5–2.5M
Loading nearby earthquake history...
Loading nearest mapped fault...
Similar price range in the same area
福島県いわき市小名浜字芳浜
¥7,900,000
福島県本宮市仁井田字下ノ原
¥7,900,000
福島県福島市丸子字御山越
¥7,880,000
福島県二本松市岳東町
¥7,880,000
福島県白河市明戸
¥7,980,000
福島県南相馬市小高区南町２-60
¥7,990,000