2DK · 169.87m² land · 36.02m² building · Built 1977
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable. The score is deliberately mid-range, so local hazard detail should carry more weight than the headline number.
Well priced relative to similar nearby properties.
Some amenities are nearby, but a car is still helpful.
The area shows some demographic softness, but not a collapse signal.
Age and condition likely imply heavier renovation work.
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
Built under the pre-1981 seismic code. Japan's 1981 reform materially strengthened earthquake-resistance requirements, so retrofit planning is usually part of due diligence.Estimated retrofit cost: ~¥1.5–2.5M
Loading nearby earthquake history...
Loading nearest mapped fault...
Similar price range in the same area
福島県大沼郡三島町大字大谷字林崎
¥4,500,000
福島県二本松市智恵子の森２
¥4,500,000
福島県いわき市佐糠町荒屋
¥4,490,000
福島県いわき市山田町林越
¥4,450,000
福島県いわき市勿来町四沢作田
¥4,600,000
福島県南相馬市原町区小川町
¥4,330,000