足立区千住24-8
4LDK · 276m² land · 163m² building · Built 1971 · rc
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are high landslide exposure and an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
The main risk drivers here are high landslide exposure and an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable. The score is deliberately mid-range, so local hazard detail should carry more weight than the headline number.
Price is near the area average.
Favorable zoning and road access for rebuilding.
Shops, transit, and daily amenities are reachable on foot.
The surrounding municipality looks relatively stable or improving.
Age and condition likely imply heavier renovation work.
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are high landslide exposure and an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
Built under the pre-1981 seismic code. Japan's 1981 reform materially strengthened earthquake-resistance requirements, so retrofit planning is usually part of due diligence.Estimated retrofit cost: ~¥1.5–2.5M
Loading nearby earthquake history...
Loading nearest mapped fault...
Similar price range in the same area
東京都西多摩郡瑞穂町大字高根
¥19,000,000
Jingumae, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo
¥19,000,000
東京都日野市平山６
¥18,800,000
東京都東大和市湖畔１
¥18,800,000
東京都あきる野市入野
¥18,800,000
東京都武蔵村山市残堀２
¥18,800,000