4LDK · 80.15m² land · 92.74m² building · Built 1977
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable. The score is deliberately mid-range, so local hazard detail should carry more weight than the headline number.
Priced above similar nearby properties.
Shops, transit, and daily amenities are reachable on foot.
The surrounding municipality looks relatively stable or improving.
Age and condition likely imply heavier renovation work.
Elevated due diligence needed
The main risk drivers here are an older seismic code era. Review the hazard panel for local shaking, flood, and fault context before treating the score as investable.
Built under the pre-1981 seismic code. Japan's 1981 reform materially strengthened earthquake-resistance requirements, so retrofit planning is usually part of due diligence.Estimated retrofit cost: ~¥1.5–2.5M
Loading nearby earthquake history...
Loading nearest mapped fault...
Similar price range in the same area
大阪府高槻市大冠町３
¥33,800,000
大阪府大阪市東淀川区大桐３
¥33,800,000
大阪府高槻市芝生町４
¥33,800,000
大阪府枚方市茄子作４
¥33,800,000
大阪府吹田市吹東町
¥33,800,000
大阪府池田市畑３
¥33,800,000